By a regulated optimist who grades with a pencil, votes with both hands, and believes institutions should show their work.
⸻
I. Naming the Thing
When The New Yorker asked, "What does it mean that Donald Trump is a fascist?", it tried to pry the word loose from decades of sloppy overuse and return it to analytic service. The piece's thesis wasn't a cartoon of uniforms and salutes; it was about method: the leader as a presence that bends law, language, and fear into a single instrument—scapegoats named, enemies manufactured, institutions hollowed by spectacle. That's a useful frame, if we promise to do what the essay did: argue with evidence, not vibes.
Ten months into Trump's second term, we have enough evidence to test the term in practice. Not by tallying tweets, but by looking at state power: who it targets, how it moves, and what it leaves behind. Three arenas tell the story: (1) immigration enforcement (raids, uniforms, jurisdiction); (2) elections (rules, purges, policing of the referees); (3) deployments and money as leverage (troops, budgets, and who gets punished). The picture is not a sepia-tone replay of Europe in the 1930s; it is an American pattern: maximal executive theater coupled to administrative pressure on antagonists and protections for allies. Where you land on that spectrum—hard authoritarian or merely illiberal—depends on how seriously you take the facts below.
⸻
II. Immigration as Stagecraft—and as Statecraft
Worksite raids returned, scaled, and televised. After a long period of restraint under prior guidance, the administration has leaned back into worksite operations with publicized sweeps of high-visibility industries. Watch California to see the method: garment shops, agricultural fields, and restaurants hit in multi-agency blitzes; families scattered; local economies jolted. CalMatters has tracked the pattern across the state; the American Immigration Council's October brief lays out how the new wave works and what it breaks. The point of a raid is not only who is detained; it is who watches.
Paramilitary optics met courtroom limits. In Chicago, a federal judge ordered agents working the administration's "Operation Midway Blitz" to wear and activate body cameras, and temporarily restricted riot-control weapons and unmarked officers, after documented abuses against protesters and bystanders. That ruling followed a separate restraining order that blocked the administration's push to bring in National Guard units, a block that higher courts kept in place—pending the White House's emergency appeal to the Supreme Court. The judiciary is doing slow, boring, essential work: telling the executive where the line is.
The sum of those facts—aerial raids staged for cable, coupled to litigation that reluctantly corrals the excess—is not "fascism" as myth; it's executive maximalism as operating system. The target is chosen to be popular; the spectacle is chosen to travel.
⸻
III. Elections: Rule by Rule, Pressure by Pressure
A federal "election integrity" order with long shadows. In March, the White House issued "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections." It sounds anodyne. Read the fine print: it re-centers federal executive agencies in the testing/certification and data-request lanes and nudges the Election Assistance Commission toward an unusually activist posture. The memo broke no single law; it rearranged incentives and muscle memory. That is the administrative state in the key of power politics.
DOJ as pry bar. By early autumn, the Justice Department had sued eight states to compel bulk access to voter-registration data—framed as list maintenance, read by many states as federal overreach into canvassing and purges. Meanwhile, aligned organizations pushed to reinterpret federal pro-voter laws into tools for mass removals; the Public Interest Legal Foundation went to the Supreme Court asking it to green-light aggressive purge regimes. The Brennan Center's fall dossiers stitch the pattern into a timeline: government plus friendly litigants, squeezing from both sides.
Why this matters more than rhetoric. Voter-list maintenance is necessary; the National Voter Registration Act literally requires it. The fight is how: "reasonable effort" vs. shotgun purge. Local reporters have done the civic work of translating the legalese: Arizona's VoteBeat piece is as fair a primer as you'll find. The administration's role here is gravitational—pulling the process toward speed and suspicion, and letting allied plaintiffs argue the rest.
This is how you move a democracy without breaking glass: change the inputs (what data is hauled, how quickly, and by whom), then let fear of error do the rest.
⸻
IV. Troops, Budgets, and the Punishment of Enemies
Troops where the base wants them, not where crime is. The administration insists that cross-state National Guard deployments are needed to quell lawlessness and support immigration enforcement in "out-of-control" cities. A Stateline analysis compared crime data with deployments and found the pattern did not correlate with the cities experiencing the worst violent-crime rates; it did correlate with partisan geography. AP and CBS both confirm the live docket: the White House asking the Supreme Court to overrule lower courts and allow Guard deployments in Illinois, with similar fights rippling in other blue-state metros. The signal to mayors is plain: submit—or we'll send uniforms.
Budget as cudgel. In the current shutdown, the administration froze an additional $11 billion in Army Corps and related infrastructure funds, disproportionately hitting Democratic-led cities and projects—from New York's water systems to San Francisco's waterfront—on top of at least $28 billion already paused. OMB calls it prioritization; in practice it's a map of punishment. Infrastructure is not just concrete; it's leverage.
You don't need a theory of fascism to read this; you need a ledger: who gets the troops, who loses the money, who writes the rules.
⸻
V. What the "F-word" Clarifies—and What It Can Obscure
The most useful part of the New Yorker frame is its focus on method: myth-making, the exaltation of force, the construction of enemies, the corrosion of mediating institutions. On those counts, the evidence is stark:
- Myth-making: the leader as singular redeemer of a nation under siege (the proclamations, the rallies, the "finish the job" catechism).
- Force as theater: armored agents and Guard troops in Democratic cities—where the politics, not the crime statistics, make the headlines.
- Enemies named: migrants as contagion; "election cheaters" as ubiquitous; civil servants as "deep state."
- Mediators corroded: starving UN-adjacent functions (in foreign policy), leaning on the EAC (in domestic policy), and pushing courts into constant emergency appeals.
But the word can also flatten differences that matter. Classic European fascism aspired to total mobilization under one party; American illiberalism relies more on federalism and litigation—a chessboard where wins are cumulative, not revolutionary. The executive order on elections did not dissolve a parliament; it tilted an obscure certification pipeline. The Guard deployments have met a wall of injunctions; the administration is seeking work-arounds, not suspending courts. That difference is not a comfort; it's a cue: the fight is administrative, and the tools are mundane.
⸻
VI. The Record, Point by Point
ICE raids: scaled up at high-visibility worksites, especially in California; brief pauses followed by renewed sweeps; industry-specific shockwaves.
Federal agents' conduct: court-ordered body cameras and restrictions in Chicago after documented abuses connected to a named operation.
National Guard deployments: enjoined in Illinois; White House seeks Supreme Court relief; pattern of deployments not matching cities with highest crime.
Elections policy: a March 25 executive order centralizing federal leverage points; subsequent DOJ suits for bulk voter-list access in eight states; allied litigation to turn federal voter-access statutes into purge mandates.
Budget leverage: shutdown-era freezes hitting blue metros' infrastructure disproportionally.
Take these together and the pattern is legible: the spectacle of force, the bureaucracy as lever, the budget as whip.
⸻
VII. What an Adult Opposition Should Do (Beyond Slogans)
Litigate—and publish the wins. The Chicago rulings (body cams; TROs) show courts still function as brakes. Publish compliance dashboards so the victory is not just a PDF; make visible when the state obeys.
Flood the pipes with facts. On list maintenance, put clean NVRA implementation guides in every clerk's inbox; cite the Arizona primer and the EAC's own rules. If purgers can point to "reasonable effort," make "reasonable" mean accuracy and due process.
Track deployments with data, not adjectives. Stateline's analysis should be updated monthly—crime rates vs. troop presence. If the pattern remains partisan, you've built an evidentiary spine for injunctions and appropriations riders.
Protect workforces where raids hit. Pair legal clinics with industry compliance compacts (wage theft, safety, E-Verify transparency), so raids don't become a discipline device that chills reporting. CalMatters' reporting points to where.
Budget jujitsu. If the administration weaponizes freezes, cities can weaponize publish-or-perish: project dashboards that show what is delayed and who is harmed, coupled to municipal bridge financing that keeps essentials moving and documents federal discrimination for later litigation.
⸻
VIII. The Optimism That Isn't Naïve
The danger now isn't that America suddenly becomes something it's never been; it's that we normalize a form of governance that punishes enemies and rewards friends using the everyday knobs of administration: a procurement here, a troop convoy there, a data demand that sounds like hygiene and behaves like suppression. The cure is not only elections. It's competent, boring counter-administration—in court, in budgets, in forms.
The New Yorker's challenge was to use the heavy word without making it a spell. Take the invitation. If you need the word to stay awake, use it. But then do the work: name the operations, litigate the orders, follow the money, count the troops, and fix the pipes that carry elections and rights.
The method is the message. And methods can be changed.
⸻
Sources (selected, current)
- Concept frame: What Does It Mean That Donald Trump Is a Fascist? (The New Yorker).
- ICE worksite raids—scope and impacts: CalMatters reporting on California raids; American Immigration Council factsheet (Oct 2025).
- Agent conduct & court limits (Chicago): Reuters on body-cam order and restrictions tied to "Operation Midway Blitz."
- National Guard deployments dispute: AP and CBS on emergency appeal to allow Guard in Illinois; Stateline data analysis showing mismatch between deployments and crime rates.
- Executive order on elections: White House text of Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections (Mar 25, 2025); CRS Insight on federal voting-system testing/certification after the E.O.
- Federal lawsuits & purge push: PBS NewsHour on DOJ suits for voter lists; Brennan Center timelines on federal interference; Democracy Docket on PILF petition to SCOTUS.
- Budget leverage: Reuters on $11B added infrastructure freeze amid shutdown, concentrated in Democratic-led metros (total paused ≥$28B).
⸻